Biological age uncertainty independently predicts mortality and health decline in humans
Researchers derived biological age uncertainty across UK Biobank participants, finding that higher uncertainty reflects reduced physiological coherence and predicts worse health outcomes.
medRxiv · Li Y et al. · Paper published 28 Sep 2026
In more than 450,000 UK Biobank participants, researchers developed a probabilistic framework to measure biological age uncertainty alongside the standard biological age gap. Uncertainty correlated weakly with the biological age gap and increased when age signals disagreed across discrete organs and individual molecules. Higher biological age uncertainty independently predicted mortality, loss of healthspan, and multimorbidity. Specifically, mortality hazard ratios were 1.24 per standard deviation for NMR-derived uncertainty and 1.40 for proteomic-derived uncertainty. Longitudinal increases in NMR-derived uncertainty marked subsequent health decline, and routine blood markers replicated mortality findings across three external cohorts. Cross-omic and genetic analyses linked uncertainty to inflammation, lipid metabolism, and tissue remodeling.
Why it matters
Evaluating the uncertainty of biological age estimates captures the loss of coherence across aging systems. This establishes uncertainty as a separate, functional dimension of aging biology rather than mere measurement noise.
Caveats
The work is an observational study published as a preprint that has not yet undergone peer review. While three external cohorts replicated mortality associations using routine bloods, broader experimental validation remains necessary.
Written from the paper’s abstract, and every claim checked against it before publishing. Read the paper for the full methods and data.
The paper
Uncertainty redefines biological age
Li Y, Feng G, Yan S et al.
medRxiv · 28 Sep 2026 · Preprint, not yet peer-reviewed
- Relevance
- Core geroscience
- News value
- Important
- Evidence
- Humans
- Status
- Preprint
More on Aging clocks
See allOrgan age acceleration and mortality risk reflect distinct biological processes
Multi-omics clocks across fourteen organs reveal divergent molecular programs and uncover thirteen candidate genes separating age acceleration from mortality.
Research Square · Na R et al.
Retinal imaging model predicts age and reveals sex differences in human aging
The retinal age gap correlates with mortality, disease risks, and sex-specific genetic pathways in more than 71,000 UK Biobank participants.
Nature communications · Trofimova O et al.
Blood cell composition explains substantial variation in DNA methylation age
Cell counts explain less variation in age acceleration and only modestly affect its links to mortality and 176 incident health outcomes.
Genome medicine · Jonkman TH et al.
Kidney tubular epithelial cells drive accelerated epigenetic aging in disease
A cross-species single-cell atlas links injured human kidney cells and aged mouse kidneys to shared chromatin reorganization and impaired repair.
Nature aging · Jeong H et al.
Chronological age prediction does not prove biological age measurement
Researchers show that standard age-trained clocks reflect task-specific statistics rather than true biological aging constructs, limiting how researchers interpret clock gaps and rejuvenation.
bioRxiv · Song S et al.